Epistemology: Advanced Course (B-KUL-W0Q20A)

6 ECTSEnglish39 First termCannot be taken as part of an examination contract
This course is taught this academic year, but not next year. This course is taught this academic year, but not next year.
POC Philosophy (internationaal)

By the end of the course, students should:

  • understand the central issues presented in this course, including core theses and arguments for and against these theses;
  • understand relevant relations between these issues;
  • be able to clearly and concisely articulate these issues in their own words;
  • be able to critically discuss questions and assess arguments related to these issues;
  • be able to offer and argue for their views on these issues.

While no specific previous philosophical knowledge is required, students are expected to have taken introductory courses in epistemology (for example, W0W06A) and logic (for example, W0W03A). Familiarity with key concepts and tools of analytic philosophy is highly desirable, as well.

Students who have no background in epistemology or logic are expected to acquire familiarity with those before the start of the course. Those would like to receive recommendations in this regard should contact the instructor by e-mail.

Activities

6 ects. Epistemology: Advanced Course (B-KUL-W0Q20a)

6 ECTSEnglishFormat: Lecture39 First term
POC Philosophy (internationaal)

The content changes from year to year. The theme of 2024-25 is: The Ethics of Belief

The ethics of belief is a debate on topics at the intersection of epistemology and ethics, with wide-ranging connections to other areas in philosophy, including feminist philosophy, political philosophy, the philosophy of language, and the philosophy of mind. As its name suggests, the debate concerns the normative dimensions of our practices of belief formation, revision, and relinquishment. As such, the most central question in the debate is: what should we believe? Other central questions include the following: Are there genuine obligations to hold certain beliefs or refrain from having them? If we have such obligations, what are the norms of belief like? Does belief have an aim, and, if it does, what is it and what is the relation between the aim of belief and its norms? Can there be practical or moral reasons for belief? Do practical or moral factors encroach on the epistemic? Can beliefs harm or wrong others? Are there genuine epistemic kinds of injustice? Are belief formation, revision, and relinquishment under our voluntary control, and, if that is the case, what kind of control is it? If we lack such control, how can we even have norms of belief? How are we responsible for what we believe?

Recent work on the topic also relates to and addresses pressing societal and political challenges ranging from trust in public institutions or those who report being victims of rape, to the proliferation of online disinformation, science skepticism, and the legal standards of proof.

The essay that christened the debate was published in 1877 by William Kingdon Clifford; and, arguably, philosophical reflections on some of these questions are even older—perhaps, as old as philosophy itself. But the debate is anything but stale. The ethics of belief has received considerable attention over the past twenty-five years, emerging as one of the hottest current debates in analytic philosophy.

 

All required readings will be made accessible through Toledo.

 

The course is designed as a reading seminar with presentations by the instructor and the students, either individually or in groups. Students are expected to read the required readings before each class and actively participate in class discussions. Additional optional readings are recommended but, obviously, not mandatory.

To best prepare for class discussions, students are required to complete assignments about the required readings. Each assignment consists of two or three questions aimed to assess the student’s understanding of core concepts and core arguments presented in the readings.

Evaluation

Evaluation: Epistemology: Advanced Course (B-KUL-W2Q20a)

Type : Continuous assessment without exam during the examination period
Description of evaluation : Paper/Project, Participation during contact hours


Students will be graded on their participation in the course, their weekly assignments, and their final paper. More specifically: 

  • 10% of the grade is based on the student’s participation, including attendance and oral presentations.
  • 10% of the grade is based on the student’s weekly assignments.
  • 80% of the grade for this course is based on the final paper. This is a standard academic paper of 4000 (±400) words.

Note that, to receive a passing grade for the course (that is, a score of 10/20 or higher), each student must:

  • actively participate in class discussions;
  • adequately complete at least 50% of the weekly assignments;
  • submit the final paper.

The second examination attempt is limited to the (re)submission of the final paper. Participation in class discussions can only occur during class, and the weekly assignments cannot be retaken.