Risk Management in Financial Institutions (B-KUL-D0R09A)

6 ECTSEnglish39 Second termCannot be taken as part of an examination contract
OC Toegepaste economische wetenschappen FEB Campus Leuven

This course aims at developing a thorough understanding of risk management for a financial institution. The focus of this course is on the theoretical foundations of risk measurement, its empirical evidence and practical relevance.  Upon completion of this course, the student is able to:

  • Identify the different risks a financial institution is exposed to and link to the regulatory framework
  • Explain and calculate the drivers of the different risks
  • Apply statistical tools needed to measure risk
  • Compute the risk in a portfolio with different risk measurement tools, with a focus on Value-at-Risk (VaR)
  • Compare and evaluate different risk measurement methods
  • Use excel to implement risk management solutions

At the beginning of this course, students have a basic knowledge of statistics, econometrics and financial products.

Activities

6 ects. Risk Management in Financial Institutions (B-KUL-D0R09a)

6 ECTSEnglishFormat: Lecture39 Second term
OC Toegepaste economische wetenschappen FEB Campus Leuven

This course explains the ways in which risks are quantified and managed by financial institutions. The course first gives a typology of risk and explains the different risks a financial institution is exposed to. Once the risks are identified, we quantify these risks. To this end, we review the statistical tools used in a risk management context and implement different risk measures. We zoom in on the most widely used tool Value-at-Risk (VaR) and extensively evaluate this risk measure (both across different risk measure categories as well as within the VaR category). The course is structured as follows:

Part 1: Introduction to risk management

Part 2: Risk measurement

  • Tools for measuring risks
  • Volatility and comovement
  • Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall

Part 3: Measuring market risk

  • Market risk
  • Market Value-at-Risk

Part 4: measuring credit risk

  • Credit risk
  • Credit Value-at-Risk

Part 5: Risk management in practice

  • Stress testing and scenario analysis
  • Regulation

Toledo is being used for this learning activity.

Recommended (but non-compulsory) readings:

  • Hull, J.: Risk Management in Financial Institutions.
  • Jorion, P.: Value-at-Risk.

Students are expected to follow the lectures and practice their knowledge and understanding of the material discussed via exercises. On Toledo, a discussion forum is opened where students can discuss the solutions to these exercises and the lecture material. This discussion is monitored by the lecturer. All modalities about the lectures are communicated via Toledo.

Throughout the course Excel is used to implement the risk measurement tools widely used in financial institutions. An assignment (part of the formal evaluation) further trains students on their skills to implement risk management theory for specific cases. The modalities of the assignment and deadlines are communicated via Toledo.


 

Evaluation

Evaluation: Risk Management in Financial Institutions (B-KUL-D2R09a)

Type : Partial or continuous assessment with (final) exam during the examination period
Description of evaluation : Written, Paper/Project
Type of questions : Open questions
Learning material : List of formulas, Calculator


FEATURES OF THE EVALUATION

The evaluation consists of a final exam and an assignment. The final exam is a written exam with open questions. Students can use a calculator and formulae sheet. The assignment consists of a practical application of market value-at-risk. The modalities and deadline of the assignment are announced via Toledo.

DETERMINATION OF THE GRADES

  • The grades are determined by the lecturer as communicated via Toledo and stated in the examination schedule. The result is calculated and communicated as a whole number on a scale of 20.
  • The final grade is a weighted score and consists of: the final exam counts for 80% of the final grade, and the assignment counts for 20% of the final grade.
  • If the student does not participate in one (or more) of the partial evaluations, the grades for these partial evaluations will be a 0-grade within the calculations of the final grade.
  • If the set deadline and/or modalities of the assignment are not respected, the grade for that respective part will be a 0-grade in the final grade, unless the student asked the lecturer to arrange a new deadline/modified modalities. This request needs to be motivated by grave circumstances

 

2nd EXAM OPPORTUNITY

The features of the evaluation and/or the determination of grades differ between the first and the second examination opportunity: at the second opportunity, assignments are no longer part of the evaluation.

 

See 'Explanation' for further information regarding the second examination opportunity.