Master's Thesis Part I: Individual Research Training (B-KUL-C02F3A)

6 ECTSDutchBoth termsCannot be taken as part of an examination contract
Devroe Wouter (coordinator) |  N.
POC Rechten

a) Overview of course objectives

The course will deal with:
• the development of a solid legal research proposal, according to an FWO/NWO format.
• an introduction to strategies and methods of legal research.
• learning how to manage yourself and your supervisor.
• individual legal research skills and a concise introduction to social science research methods
• learning to critically reflect on your own writings and assess the scientific quality of scholarly legal publications and the work of peers

The course is designed to provide students faculty guidance and peer support for the writing of a research proposal. The central aim of this course is really the development of such a proposal. Linked to that, the course is focused at the exercise of knowledge acquired in the sessions of ‘Methods of Legal Research’. Parallel to the course, you will have to foster an intensive co-operation with your ‘faculty mentors’ being specialists in a particular field of law that your research proposal is situated in (e.g. private law, criminal law, or law and economics). The course is not intended as a substitute for specialized training on particular legal topics, which you may expect from teachers in domain courses, mentors and/or other supervisors.


b) Course objectives in detail

We distinguish three major building blocks in the course: knowledge, skills and application.

Objective 1. Knowledge of

1. The components of a good research proposal and the elements of a legal research design (particularly the most common elements used by the FWO/NWO)
2. The function of the research question, the different types of research questions and the consequences for the choice of methods
3. The criteria that are used in the evaluation of research designs and research proposals

Objective 2. Skills

1. Basic ingredients of intellectual craftsmanship
2. Extrapolation: Reflection on your own research interests and research experiences for making new research driven choices
3. Finding a research topic for starting a new project
4. Assembling research questions, data needed to answer the question and methods to collect the necessary data
5. Ensuring the innovative character and/or original approach of your research project
6. Written and oral reporting and communication with respect to your own research
7. Interviewing experts
8. Giving and handling feedback (by course teachers, mentors/supervisors and peers)
9. Complying with deadlines and formal requirements

Objective 3. Application and synthesis

1. Application of knowledge and skills in the development of your own research proposal.


This course unit is a prerequisite for taking the following course units:
C01J1A : Masterscriptie OZM

Activities

6 ects. Master's Thesis Part I: Individual Research Training (B-KUL-C02F3a)

6 ECTSDutchFormat: PracticalBoth terms
N.
POC Rechten

The course consists of the following sessions:

Start weekend research master: Introduction to the Research Master as well as to the different courses, including ‘Individual Research Training’. During the start weekend there will also be a session on 'How to do a literature review', which focuses on understanding the purpose of a literature review, its structure and the criteria used to evaluate the literature review.

Searching for literature in electronic (inter)national databases: This session focuses on learning to search electronic (international) databases at the library, judging the reliability of websites/sources and the difference between books and journals. Moreover, a number of open access sources such as SSRN, blogs and google scholar will be explained.

How to write an abstract: In this session you will learn the purpose of an abstract, how it is structered and written and the criteria used to evaluate an abstract.

Assessment criteria for evaluating a research proposal: Based on knowledge acquired in the preceding session of ‘Methods of Legal Research’, this session focuses on how the research proposal will be evaluated by possible reviewers.

Research Questions: This session will focus on the application of the theoretical insights on research questions to your own research by means of examples, group work and individual assignments. You will practice with showing the relevance and originality of your own research and with classifying your research ideas into the different types of legal research. Most importantly, you will practice with formulating good research questions.

Progress of topic exploration: This session will help making you reflect on your topic exploration so far, especially on the two topics of your literature reviews. It will also force you to make first decisions about the remainder of the year; the topic to choose for the research proposal and why.

Doctrinal methods in your research: This session will make you reflect about and practice with doctrinal methods in your research proposal. You are introduced to the most common methods and approaches for conducting traditional legal research. The link between research question and research method will be heavily stressed and also so known methodological pitfalls will be discussed. Finally this session will underline that every research is in need of an own methodology as every research is unique (depending its central and sub research questions).

Content Analysis and Coding Texts: In this session, you will learn to work with social science methods of textual analysis. This includes a training on coding text with software and identifying major themes.

Practical challenges of social science methods: In this session, you are introduced to the challenges of using social science methods for your research. You will learn the do's and don'ts when conducting empirical research and will practice with applying the basic concepts of empirical research on a specific research problem.

Presentation skills: This session aims to teach you the skills to present your research (project). It will also concentrate on how to answer questions concerning your research (project).

Feedback and peer review session on draft Research Proposal: After presenting your draft Research Proposal, you will get feedback from the teachers as well as from your peers. This should help you to improve your final Research Proposal.

The course material consists of a syllabus given to you at the beginning of the course, a reader with texts produced by the teachers and a number of literature sources, such as books and articles. These will be provided to you by the teachers.

Evaluation

Evaluation: Master's Thesis Part I: Individual Research Training (B-KUL-C22F3a)

Type : Exam outside of the normal examination period
Description of evaluation : Oral, Written
Type of questions : Open questions
Learning material : Course material, Reference work, Code/lawbook


April 2017: Draft Research Proposal (not graded).
May 2017: Research Proposal (100% of final grade of this course). For this research proposal, the FWO format will be followed.

If one cannot to keep to the deadline, the following consequences will be imposed: reduction of the grade with 2 points per week of late submission.

The research proposal will be graded on the basis of the following format:

  • Abstract  .../1 pt.
  • State of the art .../2 pts.
  • Research objectives, research questions and research impact: .../2 pts.
  • Methodology .../3 pts.
  • Written presentation .../1 pt.
  • Oral presentation at feedback day .../1pt
  • TOTAL : 10 . For KULeuven students that result will be multiplied by two, to achieve a result on 20.

Word limit:

  • for abstract: max. 1500 characters (including spaces)
  • for state of the art, research objectvies, research questions and research impact and methodology: max. 2500-3500 words (to be defined) in total, excluding footnotes, bibliography and possible annexes such as workplan, communication to non-expert panel, etc.

If one exceeds the word limit, the following consequences will be imposed: anything beyond the word count will not be taken into account for the grading and for every 500 words over the limit the grade is reduced with 2 points.